Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Sample Answer 1:
Some environmental problems are regional like cyclones and some others are global - greenhouse effects for instance. With the span of time, most of the environmental problems are becoming global issues and I believe that global initiatives should be taken for the best result and to make the world a better place to live in.
To begin with, environmental problems are generally caused by humans and while some of them are national in nature, most of them are global issues. Noise or water pollution at a time remain national problems but after a certain period, it would turn into a problem for the whole world. Thus if some environmental problems are left unaddressed due to its span in a country, it would soon become the problem for all nations.
Moreover, not all nations are equally qualified to address issues of such magnitude, due to their economic and political aspects, and this is why other affluent nations should extend their helping hands to solve such problems. Rich nations contribute more to the global warming and this is why they need to build a common platform to bring all nations together to fight the environmental problems. For a poor country, it is quite tough to allocate budget for saving the greenery while millions of its population are suffering from hunger and natural disaster. This is why other rich nations have natural obligations to help those poor or developing nations.
To draw the conclusion, global environmental problems like greenhouse effects, global warming etc. have already become the concern for every nation. A collaborative effort to address these problems would be a better strategy while each nation is not equally adept to solve the global problems.
Model Answer 2:
Environmental problems greatly vary in terms of their magnitudes and some of these are local, while others are definitely global in nature - the greenhouse effect or global warming for example. For the best result, these short of problems should be addressed at the most appropriate levels, sometimes even at multiple levels.
To begin with, some environmental problems are generally caused by a group of people in a particular region and these issues get accelerated by the rapid expansion of industrialisation in this region. These sorts of problems often include noise pollution, air pollution, deforestation, intoxicating waste disposal etc. and these are generally national in nature. It is better to address these types of environmental problems at the national level and educating people is a viable solution in this scenario. International aid sometimes can help a poor or developing country to address environmental problems but the government of the country should take initiatives to solve such national problems.
Having said that, some environmental problems, for instance, common river, coastline or sea pollution concerns more than one countries and those sorts of problems should be addressed at a bilateral level. Similarly, if an environmental problem concerns a large region, for instance, a continent, that should be discussed and fought by the countries that are located on this continent. Some common examples of this type of environmental problems are desertification, soil erosion, aridness and floods.
Finally, some environmental problems pervade across national boundaries and calls for multinational or global collaboration. For example, radioactive industrial wastages in oceans, ozone layer degradation, global warming are global issues and these types of problems should be addressed by every single nation in the world. For greater success and effectiveness, I believe that the commitment of countries, especially rich nations, is quite important.
To conclude, environmental problems should be viewed as a common problem for the mankind and those global problems should be endorsed and shared globally by all nations. Similarly, rich nationals should help the developing nations to fight their regional and national environmental problems for the best result.
Along with the development of the society, there are an increasing number of issues brought to consideration, one of which is how to approach environmental problems that are threats to people’s quality of life in the modern era. There emerging a standpoint stating the issue should be better addressed on global scale, while others believe it is individual countries’ responsibility. This essay’s aim is providing personal position favoring both viewpoints and appropriate reasons.
On the one hand, solving environmental problems should be first each country’s mission. As each individual country cover a particular part of global natural environment, it is responsible for preserving that part. Suppose citizens on the globe all excellently accomplish their obligation of dealing with environmental problems in the frame of their country, consequently, the issue could be remedied on global scale. Besides, a country itself is believed to best understand its environmental problems. Therefore, it can create appropriate solutions fitting its resources and financial conditions.
On the other hand, good results are also generated when the issue is considered a global duty. International organizations, world forums and pacts provide an ideal circumstance for countries’ leaders to discuss environmental problems. As a proverb goes “Two heads are better than one”, a number of brilliant world leaders may come up with creative remedies for a particularly difficult-to-solve environmental issue of a country. Moreover, in such conferences, wealthier countries have opportunities to provide help for poorer nations that possess little resources to handle their own environmental problems. By mutual assistance among countries, global environmental issues may be handled well.
Briefly, I strongly believe the best result will be produced when environmental problems are addressed both on global scale and by each country. It is both individual and the world’s responsibility to preserve the environment for the next generation.
Choose a sentence that means the same as the given one.
1. Classical music and modern music are different.
A. Classical music is like modern music.
B. Classical music is different from modern music.
C. Classical music is the same as modern music.
2. I am 14 and my new friend in the guitar club is 14 too.
A. My new friend in the guitar club is the same age as me.
B. My new friend in the guitar club is unlike me.
C. My new friend in the guitar club is not as old as me.
3. I think Iron Man 2 is interesting. Iron man 1 was also interesting .
A. I think Iron Man 2 is different from Iron Man 1.
B. I think Iron Man 2 has the same content as Iron Man 1.
C. I think Iron Man 2 is as interesting as Iron Man 1.
4. I think photography is interesting but Kim finds it boring.
A. Kim and I have the same opinion on photography.
B. My opinion on photography is different from Kim.
C. Kim’s opinion on photography is the same as mine.
5. Sue likes listening to pop music , Jim likes listening to rock and roll.
A. Sue’s favorite type of music is different from Jim’s.
B. Sue likes the same type of music as Jim.
C. Sue listens to music as much as Jim
1. We own this modern house. This modern house is ours
2. These are her shoes. These shoes are hers
3. Those fields belong to them. Those fields are theirs
4. This is our garden. This garden is ours
5. These are his toys. These toys are his
6. This dog belongs to her. This dog is hers
7. They own this big farm. This big farm is theirs
8. David and I own this red car. This red car is ours
9. Lisa has a lovely dress. A lovely dress is hers
10. He has got grey shorts. Grey shorts are his
In the modern world, people depend on energy to power their everyday lives. A wide range of power-run devices and modern conveniences (1) are taken for granted, and although it may seem that we will not be in danger of living without those conveniences, the fact is that many supplies of energy are running out rapidly. Scientists are constantly (2) searching for new sources of energy to keep modern society running. Whether future populations will continue to enjoy the benefits of abundant energy will depend (3) on the success of this search. Coal, oil and natural gas are now being used widely. (4) However, not only are supplies of , these supplies are limited, and they are a major source of pollution. Therefore, the existing alternative energy sources must be improved or futher explored and developed. These include nuclear, water, solar, and wind power, as well as energy from new, (5) nonpolluting types of fuels types of fuels. Each of these, however, has advantages and disadvantages.
1. We own this modern house. This modern house is ours
2. These are her shoes. These shoes are hers
3. Those fields belong to them. Those fields are theirs
4. This is our garden. This garden is ours
5. These are his toys. These toys are his
6. This dog belongs to her. This dog is hers
7. They own this big farm. This big farm is theirs
8. David and I own this red car. This red car is ours
9. Lisa has a lovely dress. A lovely dress is hers
10. He has got grey shorts. Grey shorts are his
1 ours
2 jerrs
3 theirs
4 ours
5 his
6 hers
7 theirs
8 ours
9 hers
10 his
What is the topic?