Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Studying English language in an English - speaking country has many advantages. Howver, I believe that it is not the best way to learn the language.
Firstly, most students who live in non - English - speaking countries learn English at secondary schooland at university.Although their spoken is not fluent, their knowledge of grammar is often quite advanced. This is useful when they come to an English - speaking country to improve the language.
Secondly, students'living at home do not have to worry about problems such as: finding accommodation, paying for their study, living costs and trying to survive in a foreign country. It would cause them much stress.
Finally, nowadays, the society is grower and grower and information technology is also improved. The internet thus also born. So we can register a few courses on the network. It also helps us to speak and communicate with English speakers.
For the reasons above, I believe that we can learn English whenever and wherever nowadays.
Some people think that it’s better for their children to grow up in the countryside; other people think that it’s better their children to grow up in a big city. Both possibilities have some advantages and disadvantages. I’ll give advantages of each approach and I’ll argue in favor of this that it’s better for children to grow up in the countryside.
In a society where money, career and convenience are important things, many people prefer to live in big cities. Consequently their children grow up there. In the following passage I’ll state some important aspects of the life in the big cities. People go to live there at many reasons. First, a big city provides many opportunities for career and education. For instance, If I live in South Dakota I’ll have chance to live in connection with nature but there are few universities and work positions. However if I live in New York I’ll have opportunity to choose between hundreds of universities and thousands free work positions. This connection If our children grow up in a big city, they will have chance to study in prestige school. Besides, they will be prepared for the life with strong competition.
However we know that the life in a big city has some disadvantages. For instance, stress is problem number one in a big city. That is why many people think that it’s better for their children to grow up in the countryside. The life there has many advantages. First, children, which grow up in the countryside, have chance to live with connection with nature. In most cases there are more calmly and they seldom suffer from psychical diseases in contrast with children which grow in a big city. The life in the countryside is not so dynamic than life in the big city. In the countryside there are few changes. For example, children often spend their childhood in one house, they study in one school, and their parents rarely change their work positions, which reflect negative on the children. To sum up, the life in the countryside is related to few problems than this in a big city.
In conclusion, I think that it’s better for children to grow up in the countryside. That is why, the first thing that we must save is health of our children.
I agree that life skills should be taught to young people at school along with traditional subjects like math and science.
First of all, we need to know what life skills are? Life skills are actions derived from things that people have been learned to respond effectively to situations or interact appropriately with those around them. So it is a very essential thing for life. For example, if we are injured, the life skill is to help us know how to bandage the wound or when there is a fire or an earthquake, it helps us to know how to escape. If we don't learn life skills, then we will have rude behavior in public places, from not knowing how to give room to the elderly to jostling each other when shopping, etc. Survival skills are the attitudes that manifest every day in life, it will be very difficult if we do not apply it on a regular basis to become good habits. But on the contrary, if we care and express ourselves in every situation, from greetings, dear ... to learning how to organize learning, playing and doing a good thing every day then everything will become simple, natural.
First of all, you should appreciate yourself, know how to equip yourself with skills to protect yourself. Then know how to respect the rules of society and take care of others. Just every day you do a good thing and do a good deed, even though simple and small, you will gradually equip yourself with skills in a safe and happy life!
We all know that life skills are very important, and my parents usually say that they are even more important than traditional subjects, such as maths, science, ... And in real life, there are many opinions about what things are more necessary. Therefore, I highly agree with this statement. And here are some reasons.
Firstly, life skills are really vital for all children, even after they graduate. Here are some of my definitions of life skills. From my point of view, any skill that is useful for one's life, such as tidying the room, cleaning the house, using a computer, etc..., can be a life skill. So, life skills are very important for each person's life. And if children study about life skills, after graduating school, they can be self-confident and they will successfully deal with every changes and challenges.
Secondly, with life skills, children can determine their life. As I have noted, small but necessary skills can be life skills, so if children don't know any skills or they can only do simple things, their living capital can be limited, so they must always have someone to help them. I think this is not really reasonable, because it means that children always depend on someone, and their lives will be very mechanical - they can't do what they want themselves.
In short, although traditional subjects provide children a large amount of knowledge, life skills must be taught together with those subjects. So, totally agree with the statement!
I do not agree on computer learning. Although learning on computers, although helping learners to be more flexible in the fields of technology and creativity, there are still many negative aspects, not meeting the learning needs of students:
First, the quality of learning via the Internet cannot be compared with the traditional way of learning - which creates better interaction between students and teachers, managed, questioned, evaluated.
Second, online training can cause social isolation, because school is not only a place to learn but also a place where they come to socialize, make new friends and learn more communication experiences.
Third, this form creates an unevenness among localities. For children who have full learning equipment, have a sense of self-study and good family management, it works. Those children with difficult and unmanaged conditions will learn to cope.
While the benefits of learning online are obvious, it's important to remember that not all courses can be taught online. Therefore, online training should be seen as a complementary and extensible approach to classical forms of learning.
I half agree with this opinion. Why?
Schools have considered the second house where the children can study, play and join the extracurricular activities. In the school, the student can learn all the subject to expand their knowledge, do the exams... and specially, they can play with their friends. But sometime, study too much make they feel stress, yeah, I know this
Study on Internet has some advantages: they can learn by the photos, stories, songs... and they can stop when they want. But, it has many disadvantage. The children are too young to choose the information on Internet, which need to know or needn't. The Internet has many temptation like: games, cartoons... make they can't forcus on study if their parents won't monitoring them, use to much or to long time the electronic device can make their eyes have many problems.
With many reasons, the Internet just help 40 percents the children on study. I think schools have many advantage than study on Internet