Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Tham khảo nha bạn:
Some people say they like living in the countryside, others like living in the city. In my opinion, I prefer to live in the countryside for the following reasons. First of all, it's a quiet and peaceful place. There are many different species of plants, so the air and food are always fresh and clean. We can enjoy a fresh natural condition without worrying much about environmental pollution. We can freely admire breathtaking landscapes such as giant grasslands, peaceful hills or forests. We can also go for a walk in the forest and pick mushrooms or hunt. Second, Without any giant apartment blocks, modern skyscrapers and annoying traffic jams in the countryside, the air is not polluted. There is also no water pollution. Moreover, living in the countryside is cheaper than in the city, so you can buy more rubber at a lower price. The other positive side is safety. In rural areas, crime rates are much lower. There are not many home break-ins and robberies. In the countryside, people often keep an eye on the neighborhood of their neighbors. They always react when something strange happens. Finally, most of the villagers are friendly and hospitable. They are always willing to help each other. Moreover, city dwellers are easily stressed by pollution, work and competition pressures. In summary, Living in the countryside has many advantages because of the fresh air, clean food, especially the friendliness and hospitality of the people.
refer
Friendship plays an important role in our lives and in the fact that it seems to be impossible to live without friends.In my opinion, there are three basic qualities that lay the firm foundation for friendship.Firstly, friendship is considered to be mutual help. A good friend is always ready to give us a hand in any situations. A friend in need is a friend indeed. We shouldn't be too deliberate in helping. Secondly, mutual confidence. Friends must feel safe when telling each other the most secrets. Obviously, liars and talkative people can never have good friends. Thirdly, talking about true friendship, I can't help mentioning the faithfulness and sharing. A true friend is the one who will cheer to our happiness and share our sorrows in adversity. In short, the value of friendship is that gives us a source of happiness and comforts our sufferings and a true friendship will be forever although we are rich or poor.
Fame seems to appeal to everyone due to its attraction and glamour. Many prefer to be a famous one or a celebrity to change their life. However, everything has its both side. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of fame.
To begin with, they get a special treatment everywhere they go. Celebrities get special tables at restaurants, best sit at theatres and VIP treatment at clubs or events. They get free parking at hotels or they cars are guarded at events.
On the other hand, celebrities have no private, that make they are constantly judged. They are judged for the clothes they wear, their bodies, make-up, personalities and cars that they drive. Newspapers, magazines, blogs and social networks you can always find the rude, nasty, insulting, and derogatory and lies about celebrity’s daily routine. It’s like we forget that they’re human beings.
Fame carries also worry about your own safety and the safety of your family. There is always a danger that a crazy fan may try to kidnap or kill you or your children, so it is necessary to employ bodyguards.
All in all, fame may be nice but not an easy thing to live with. You have money but you do not feel safe, you have friends and fans but you can never be sure if they like you for who you are or for your money.
Mọi người sửa giúp em bài này ạ! Em cảm ơn mọi người nhiều <3
Write an essay between 100-150 words: What are the advantages and disadvantages of being famous?
Fame seems to appeal to everyone due to its attraction and glamour. Many prefer to be a famous one or a celebrity to change their life. However, everything has its both side -> two sides : pros and cons. ( Bn muốn nhấn mạnh ở pros and cons thì nên nói rõ 2 mặt chứ both: cả, nó ko có nghĩa là 2 mặt ). This essay will discuss the pros and cons of fame.-> Câu này phải bỏ vì đây là văn viết chứ ko phải văn nói.
To begin with, they get a special treatment everywhere they go. Bổ sung thêm trong câu này luôn nha : They can also get good medical care ỏ excellent entertainment. For example, we can treated by well-qualified doctors n high qualify hospitals. Celebrities get special tables at restaurants, best sit at theatres-> theaters and VIP treatment at clubs or events. They get free parking at hotels or they cars are guarded at events. -> Ko đc hợp lí nên bỏ bớt đi.
* Thức ra đã nói đến advantages và disavantages của being famous thì bn phải liệt kê đủ tức là bn nói 3 pros thì cx khoảng 3-4 cons chứ ko đc 1 pros mà 3-4 cons đc.Nếu như thế nó gọi là kết cấu chưa phù hợp.
-----> Trâm sẽ liệt kê một số pros nữa nha:
* Nevertheless, The most obvious advantages of being famous is the fact that it's very easy to earn money so they can purchase things. They can enjoy their life and have a good conditions like a large house with garden, big living room, large and big bedroom,.. with a lot of ne modern technologies..... etc.
* Moreover, it's interesting to appear on TV or magazines and be admitted by lots of people.
------ Chú ý sử dụng đa dạng từ và từ nối.
On the other hand, celebrities have no private-> private life -> như thế mói biểu thị rõ ý nghĩa, that make they are constantly-> frequently judged. They are judged for the clothes they wear, their bodies, make-up, personalities and cars that they drive. In Newspapers, magazines, blogs and social networks, you can always find the rude, nasty, insulting, and derogatory and-> or lies about celebrity’s daily routine. It’s like we forget that they’re human beings.-> nên bỏ đi.
Fame carries-> The famous also worry about your->their own safety and the safety of your-> their family. There is always a danger that a crazy fans or anti-fans may try to kidnap or kill you or your children, so it is necessary to employ bodyguards.
All in all, fame may be nice but not an easy thing to live with. You have money but you do not feel safe, you have friends and fans but you can never be sure if they like you for who you are or for your money.
* Kết bài khá độc đáo tuy nhiên ở ngay sau câu đầu tiên bn có thể nói lên suy nghĩ của mình ví dụ như : I'm in favor of having a normal life than being famous. As you have money.....
-----------> Trên đây là suy nghĩ là góp ý của Trân về bài viết của bn.
1. I prefer reading in bed
=> I like to read in bed
2. Does Trung hate to do morning exercises?
does trung dislike doing morning excersice?
3. We love to skateboard in the park after school
we are interested in skateboarding in the park after school
4. My brother doesn't like watching documentaries
my brother dislikes watching documentaries
5. Does she prefer to watch TV during her meals?
does she like to watch TV during her meals?
6. They love sunbathing and swimming
they are interested in sunbathing and swimming
II. Write OK for the right sentences and correct the wrong ones
1. I don't mind helping my mum with the housework
OK
2. The farmer doesn't mind to go=>GOING to the field early in the morning
3. Tony detested to eat=>EATING spicy food when he was child
4. His children adore reading comics
Ok
5. Does Mai prefer drink=>drinking coffee in the evening ?
6. Do you fancy to eat some sweets?
ok
7. The girl adores play=>to play with her dolls
8. He doesn't mind giving a lot of money to poor people
OK
Sample Answer 1:
Road safety has become a great concern for people with the rise of accidents and fatality those accidents cause every day. People have a varying opinion on how to make roads safe and I believe strict laws should be there to punish the driving offenders but a combination of other methods would bring better results.
On the one hand, people seem to abide by a law or rule when they know that violation would bring severe retribution. For instance, in some Asian countries pedestrians used to cross the roads and when a more rigid penalty has been imposed, those very people started using the underpass. From this perspective, strict penalty and fine can certainly improve the road safety as people would be more cautious and afraid of the consequence of the violation of the traffic laws. As an outcome, it is a fact that, the sterner the punishment, the greater chances that people would follow the rules.
On the other hand, there are already severe punishments for driving offenders including ceasing the driving license, monetary fines and imprisonments. Despite this, the number of road accidents is increasing every year. This is why I believe that only punishment cannot ensure the road security and safety. A combination of other initiatives is also required. First, we need to aware people about the devastating consequences traffic rule violations can bring to our life. Second, the requirements for passing the driving test should be standardised and made more practical, especially in developing countries where people can use advantages of the corruption. It is often noticed that many young people are given driving license without scrutinising their experience and skills. This should be completely avoided and after a certain period, each driver should be retested. Third, unfit vehicles should not be allowed to run on the roads as these cars cause more accidents according to the recent Road Transport Authority report. Finally, the traffic system of a country should be modernised and more surveillance cameras and speed test cameras should be there.
To conclude, punishment to traffic rule violators is a good way to make the road safer but the combination of other steps would bring more desired results.
Model Answer 2:
At recent years, there is an ongoing debate whether giving dire punishment to driving offences are the best solution to overcome severe accidents in roads or not. While some support this idea, many others believe that governments should provide improvements in road safety. This essay will try to discuss both views with several considerations given underneath.
People are not prompted to engage safety driving because there are no regulations relating to drivers to be more careful on the road. It can be found in developing countries where the traffic is not well arranged and as a result, the numbers of terrible accidents remain dominant. Dissimilar with it, developed countries pay more attentions in this case by restricting the use of vehicles without licence limiting the top speed in certain busy areas such as boulevards and main roads, and imposing fine for all the offence forms in high rate, and as a result, these countries can overcome traffic accidents.
However, governments with all efforts must improve the infrastructure of safety riding. Traffic signs should be renewed, the facilities in the road are supposed to be changed, etc. so the drivers can recognise the driving surroundings vividly. Furthermore, technologies are also urgent to deal with daunting events in driving environment. It is good news that outrageously inventions have been created and applied but still attempts in technology findings are required.
In conclusion, while there are regulations to be defined, governments together with scientists, engineers, and car businessmen have to maximise in providing safety riding facilities to gain maximum result on this issue.
[ Written by - Angga Cool ]
Model Answer 3:
A group of people believe that in order to increase the safety for the driving on roads, governments should make stricter regulations for any indiscipline in driving attitudes. On the contrary, another group thinks that authorities should consider other effective solutions for it. The following essay will discuss both views in details, but in my personal opinion, I do believe that the combination of both ideas would ensure a better road safety.
On the one hand, many people worry about the number of driving accidents. Each year, the number of people who are injured or pass away due to traffic accidents has increased significantly. In most cases, accidents have occurred due to the interdisciplinary acts of the drivers themselves, such as speeding, drunk driving or using their mobile phones during driving. And to solve the problem, the government should make a strict regulation about traffic accidents. People who are found to be guilty of any driving rule violation should be punished with serious penalties and detentions. By having these kinds of policy, it is hoped that traffic accident rates will decrease gradually.
On the other hand, other people believe that strict punishments would not effectively solve the problem. There are other measures which governments and the public should consider. Firstly, governments could cooperate with the media in making campaign about safe driving. Television commercials and magazine advertisements could be used by the government in socialising about the negative effect of aggressive or offensive driving. Secondly, governments could also give rewards to their citizens who are obeying the road regulations. For example, when people renew their driving license, authorities could check their track records. Those who have clean track records could get motor vehicles tax discount or exemption.
In conclusion, people have a varying opinion on how to reduce the number traffic accidents. While some people believe that there should be stricter policies and regulations about driving, others think that there should be another effective way of addressing the issue. In my point of view, I believe that both policies have their own positive sides and when people could combine them, it would be an effective way of reducing traffic accidents.
[ Written by - Darwin Lesmana ]
Model Answer 4:
Nowadays, the accidents that occur on the road are likely to rise in number in some countries. While an army of people think that these issues can be tackled by penalising offenders strictly, others think that there are other steps that can be taken to cope with it.
It is clear that the strict punishments set up for the driving offences can make them fear to break the laws. For instance, if they are proven to disobey the applied rules, it is seemly a good way to punish them by taking their driving licenses forcefully. This measure is likely to alert them to think twice before breaking the laws because if they commit it they cannot drive anymore. This way can indirectly encourage them to obey the rules hence the accidents on the road are likely to be declined. The traffic rules are applicable only for the drivers, but also for the ordinary commuters as well. While an over-bridge or an under pathway is mandatory for crossing the busy roads, many people do not obey this rules. It is not unusual that many careless drivers do not follow the traffic signals and all these violations of traffic rules cause severe accidents and congestion in many cities. Hence, implementing strict punishment and fine can be one effective solution to tackle this issue.
On the other hand, many believe that other measures could be more successful to address this problem, including creating awareness among citizens to drive safely, organising seminars & training programmes about the importance of road safety and modernising the traffic control system. The research carried out by Statistics Center, an organisation at the University of Diponegoro, reveals that citizens in Semarang who have wide knowledge about how to drive safely tend to obey the applied rules if compared to the ones who does not have this knowledge. This makes clear that these measures can be utilised to create a consciousness to be safe riders.
Apart from that, the number of cars and buses on the roads in many cities is much higher and restricting the private car ownership can reduce the number of cars on the roads and thus the number of accidents or casualties. Improving the traffic system with modern equipment and enrolling more trained and professional traffic police could be another great way to tackle this issue.
To conclude, the establishment of punishment strictly is a wise idea but by presenting workshops and training programmes to all citizens, especially drivers of different vehicles, improving the traffic control system are the finest ways to encourage them to increase security on the way.
The most important subject is writing. Not literature, but writing. This will be critical no matter what you do, whether you’re a nurse, an administrative assistant, or the president of the free world. And the understanding of maths must be considered the criterion for intelligence as well. Maths is life and no subject can run without maths. All the problems in the world required maths to solve it. Same way, anything requiring calculations is dependent on maths like every step even you make. Without proper calculations one may succeed accidentally in getting something but to continue getting the same results one surely has find what calculations made the success possible. Futhermore, English is an universal language, once you know how to speak, write and read English, you can talk to whoever and whenever, it especially good for your higher education like when you go to the college or university because some books are written in English. In conclusion, I think that students must study many things including Maths and Literature and English in order to succeed in the modern world.
TICK CHO MÌNH NHAAA :>>>
Some people say they prefer eating at restaurants to eating at home because they think they can save time spending to cook meal to do other things. However, in my view, I prefer to eat at home. For the following reasons I have three reasons explain why I think this way. First, eating at home helps you save money. Second, hardly any restaurants sever foods as healthy as those you prepare at home. Third, eating at home helps us have chances to get close to our family.
The first reason is that I can save money when eating at home. When you go to a restaurant and order dishes, look at the price on the menu and do a small calculation, you can see the price in the restaurant is at least twice higher than those you cook at home. Beside they are not delicious as food you cook at home. For example, the fried rice I order in restaurants have the price equal to those I spend to by material and make enough fried rice for the whole family. This explains for my first reason – eating at home help, you save money.
The second reason is that the food you prepare at home is healthier than those which are severed in restaurants. Compared with the soup you order at restaurants, the other one you make at home is healthier and more hygienic. For example, the soup I cook at home have more vegetables, meat, eggs, crabs, etc while those at restaurants just have little meat, crabs and vegetable, which is not enough nutrition for a person.
Third, the eating time with family is importance. It helps the family get closer. Imagine the scene of a family with mother and children cooking dinner together at weekend. They are cooking and telling the other person about their day at school or at work. Children learn how to make their favorite dishes. Father helps prepare the table and tell a joke to make the whole family laugh and bring the happy atmosphere to their house. This is one of the points that makes the house become home.
In conclusion, I prefer eating at home to eating at restaurants because of the reasons mentioned above.
cảm ơn bạn.