Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
DỊCH: Một số người tin rằng Trái đất đang bị tổn hại (hư hại) bởi hoạt động của con người. Những người khác cảm thấy rằng hoạt động của con người làm cho Trái đất trở thành một nơi tốt hơn để sống. Ý kiến của bạn là gì? Sử dụng lý do cụ thể và ví dụ để hỗ trợ câu trả lời của bạn
Nowadays testing has an extremely prominent place in education. The preparation required for examinations places limits on teachers as well as considerable amounts of stress on students. While some testing may be necessary to gain a better understanding of what a child has learned, I completely agree that excessive testing is too restricting for teachers. Furthermore, it can actually inhibit students’ learning and potentially be damaging over the long term. Firstly, with the heavy emphasis placed on exams, teachers must teach only to the test. The result of this is that teachers cannot take the time to answer students’ questions about the content. This is because there is only time to teach what is going to be in the exam. This squashes children’s natural interest in subjects. Another point to consider is that studies have shown that any student, regardless of age or subject, needs time to consolidate learning before being tested. A student who is tested too soon may get a low mark which is actually not representative of this student’s learning. Continual testing, therefore, does not take in account students’ natural developmental stages. Finally, the amount of stress placed on students to pass all these exams is not healthy. The continual cycle of preparing for a test and taking a test can exhaust and burn out even the most motivated student. This is particularly dangerous when pupils are still young. It also removes the natural joy that comes from learning for both teachers and students when exams are constantly looming over their heads. In conclusion, although a certain amount of testing will always be required at schools, I firmly believe that the current emphasis placed on tests is unnecessary and could have longterm negative effects on students.
KHÔNG NGỜ CŨNG CÓ CÁI WRITING TASK 2 CỦA IELTS Ở ĐÂY LUN Á :V
"Education is not just about going to school and getting degree. it is about widening your knowledge and absorbing the truth about life". In today's era the school system is over focused on testing. This results in stress on students about learning, and also teachers seem helpless, and are unable to adapt course to meet the needs of individuals. I am totally argue with the statement, and also give reasons as well as provide possible solutions for this.
To begin with, Teachers are unable to teach students with interest due to lack of timing. School Authorities will pressurize the teachers for completing their syllabus in a particular time. As a result of it, they are unable to give proper information to students. This results in bad performance of students in their exams. For instance, Delhi school community declared that there are still many schools; there intentions is only teach students no matter how much knowledge students gain from teachers. The solutions of this, could be limited test should conducted by school authorities to help teachers teaching the students with full knowledge and self-assureness
Tham khaor nha !
Learning the English language in a country where people speak English is a very advantageous option, although not the only way. Personally, I completely agree with this statement, because living in English spoken country has a lot of benefits in terms of mastering this language.
Learning English is easier in an English-speaking country because the people around you are speaking English and makes it easy to adjust to English accent and also sentence patterns. For instance, it is very hard to learn English accent without listening to English. Besides living in English speaking country will enrich your vocabulary and grammar and that enhancement will occur spontaneously. And you can ask anything about the language that you have doubts about. You are bound to speak in this language and that would give you an excellent opportunity to enhance your speaking skill.
On the other hand, it is not the only way to learn a language. There are a lot of books that you can utilise. English radio programmes or TV shows are best options to learn the language. So, it will help you increasing your listening skills. In addition, nowadays, the internet is widespread and also a superiority in our world. Thereby, the internet comprises all kind of information and it will help you about your doubts. It is evident that there are enough programmes for speaking with somebody in which it will improve your speaking skills.
I would agree that people who live in a country like Canada, USA, UK or Australia, where English is used as the primary way of communication, would help them master this language pretty quickly and accurately. But not always you need to live there to learn this language. It is not uncommon for people who have never been in an English speaking country to have an excellent command over this language. Some of the poets and writers who wrote successful English literature have been born and raised and lived in non-English- speaking countries.
To sum up, learning English in an English spoken language will make it easy to study but there are a lot of ways that can be used for learning this language.
In most cases the interview is the last hurdle that an applicant has to clear before landing a job. Interviews probably aren’t a foolproof method of selecting candidates; however, I can’t suggest any better alternatives.
An employer can’t fully assess a candidate’s capabilities, personality or character during an interview. Several personality development centers now prepare candidates for interviews. They are taught how to answer questions that are frequently asked during interviews. Sometimes a candidate who possesses better qualifications may fail to get the job because of his poor performance in the interview.
However, I don’t think that interviews should be done away with. Employers all over the world use this selection process to find the best candidates. This is a clear indication that interviews are an efficient method of selecting good candidates.
In my opinion, interviews should not be the only criterion for selecting candidates. They should be used in conjunction with written examinations during which a candidate’s proficiency in various subjects can be assessed. In addition, candidates should be asked to participate in debates or group discussions. Their real personality and leadership skills will come to the fore during these events.
To conclude, the interview is not a flawed recruitment process. It isn’t perfect but it certainly has more merits than demerits. In fact, when interviews are used in conjunction with other personality tests, they will definitely help businesses find the best candidates. Organisations should also consider hiring fresh graduates on a probationary basis. Those who deliver excellent performance during the probationary period should be hired to fill permanent positions.
In my opinion, everyone have the same right to study at university or college. However, only the good student should study at higher education. Therefore, I agree with the second thought.
First, Studying at university or college is not easy for everyone. The students who were really excellent at high school should enter the university to study at the major that they are really good at. Although, the other students who are not good enough, can effort to study at university or college, It is still really hard for them, especially if they do not know exactly what they are studying.
Second, Studying at university or college sometimes wastes your time and money. It is not cheap to studying in university or college. Some families have to pay a lot of money for their children to study there. And the students themselves spend a lot of time at university doing the things they aren't good at.
Third, I believe university or college is the place for students who really desire to study the field they really care about. The others, who are not good at studying will have their own job out there in the society. They can learn from their experiences in work, learn from their failures or anywhere else. The important thing is that they are still excellent in their field and become the useful people for their country, may be the famous people in the world.
Albert Einstein said that: "Everyone is a genius, but if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live it whole life believe it is stupid". I believe so. Everyone of us have the same right to study, but we also have our own mission. So study in university or not is not the matter. The matter is we know ourselves, we know what we good at and what we are doing to make our own life and this world better.
Chúc bn hc tốt
Some people think that learning English is too difficult for them but others claim that it quite easy. However, in my opinion , English is not too difficult to learn. Well, you are thinking that I am crazy to tell that because there are plenty of vocabulary, grammers, structures, ... etc. Yet, if you want to learn English well , you have to have passion for it. It also means that only when you extrememly like it will you learn it effectively. When you have your passion for English you will find a lot of ways to learn vocabulary. Moreover, when you spend much time studying English, your English will be better day by day. And after short time , you will find that English is not as difficult as you used to think.
Many teachers assign homework to students everyday, and they seldom doubt it. However, as far as I am concerned, it is not necessary.
To begin with, not every teacher has classes everyday. For instance, a chemistry teacher may have no class on Monday. It makes students learn nothing new about chemistry that day. As a result, it becomes unnecessary for the chemistry teacher to assign homework. Because if the teacher still assigns homework, perhaps the students will not have enough time to review what they have learned that day, such as physics and biology.
In addition, everyone must have his or her own leisure time. Students are not machines. They cannot work without any rest. Even if a machine works everyday, its efficiency will become lower and lower and refuse to work finally. So the teachers must let students have some spare time, when they can play games, have a picnic and do other things they like. It is good to children’s health.
Last but not least, assigning homework everyday is not a scientific way of studying. Suppose you must do physics homework everyday. After several weeks, you will probably think physics is so boring that it no longer interests you. How could one learn physics well under such circumstance? I think the only way to solve this problem is not to assign physics homework everyday.
So from what has been discussed, one can reach only this conclusion that daily homework is not necessary at all.
Tham khảo!
Bài viết 1:
The view, a year of traveling after teenagers finish high school, has been became more and more popular in the world, especially among developed countries. It's seem to be useful way for young people preparing for future and thinking about their future life.
Experts say that gap year is a chance to whom want to experience a completely independent life for first time, thinking about if necessary to continue their study or it's better to find a suitable job? For this reason traveling is a good solution both answer their question and enjoy their life. Generally speaking traveling make human a mature person, by improving human knowledge about own and the world that surrounded them. All of these help to recognize your favorites better and help to make right decision in the future. Also during a journey tolerance of human goes up and it good enough to accept your life duties best and bear hard situations.
On the other hand some people argue that such journeys covered huge cost. Since gappers pay their travel cost, they might go back home without any money for rest of life. So, they say going such journey basically is wrong. This view is true somehow. For all I think governments should pay part of costs in order to encourage people to do that, also organize these travels to be cheaper due to decrease disadvantages of it. In my view, if it is possible, this way is the big chance for the majority of gappers to know themselves.
Over all, although gap year has some disadvantages like it's expensive costs, it could be a good solution for whom want to feel a independent life if governments try to plan such trips.
Bài viết 2:
Some youngsters consider a gap year the key to enhancing their career prospects, others think it is a worthless pursuit. I believe that pursuing a gap-year can provide worthwhile experiences to juveniles, laying the seeds of a prosperous professional career. Although a gap-year is an exciting opportunity to undertake a self-development project, it is risky at the same time.
On the one hand, youngsters can gain relevant work experiences, key skills; broadening their view of the world. Working during the defer years can increase invaluable knowledge. Furthermore, experiencing other countries can help gain an appreciation and awareness of global issues, putting people in the lead. Such knowledge is paramount to secure a dream job.
On the other hand, it can cost an awful amount of money to organise and realise. To add to the ordeal, one can get bankrupt. One in ten people face financial ordeals from budget mismanagement according to gap-year tour operators, however, that number is negligible.
Finally, in my opinion, hefty expenses should be the least cause for deterring a gap-year. The return on investment is high, bringing positive drastic changes to the personality of the youngster. Travelling to other countries solidifies young adults with soft, and hard skills; moulding character and individuality. Facing and circumventing adversity in an unfamiliar country sets a solid foundation for solving problems in life. Such experience is worth the expense.
In conclusion, there is definitely an edge some young person can attain contrasting to those who consider gap-years an expensive waste of time. However, improper planning can adversely affect personal finances; accurate gap-year budget plans eliminates the risk of debt and bankruptcy.
Chào bạn, câu trả lời của bạn rất hay, cho mình hỏi bạn tự làm hay chép, nếu chép cho mình xin link của trang nha