Write a paragraph about 100 words on following topic " Helping the poor in VN is everyone's responsibility. What should students do to help the poor?
Làm ơn giúp mình với. Thanks
Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Refer:
Theo Bảng xếp hạng Tổng thể Khảo sát Chuyên gia nước ngoài về nơi sống và làm việc tốt nhất năm 2019 của HSBC Expat, Việt Nam đang thể hiện những thế mạnh khi đạt vị trí thứ 10 năm nay, vượt bậc so với năm ngoái.
Nhiều chuyên gia nhận thấy môi trường làm việc tại Việt Nam rất thuận lợi. Việt Nam đứng thứ ba, sau Thụy Sỹ và Ba Lan trong chỉ số phụ Kỳ vọng cá nhân – chỉ số tổng kết quan điểm của chuyên gia nước ngoài về nền kinh tế thị trường, cơ hội phát triển nghề nghiệp và mức độ ảnh hưởng đối với những người mới chuyển tới sinh sống và làm việc.
Mức lương trung bình hàng năm cho một chuyên gia nước ngoài chuyển đến Việt Nam là 78.750 USD, cao hơn so với mức trung bình toàn cầu là 75.966 USD.
Trong số những người trả lời khảo sát, 67% đã đồng ý rằng thu nhập khả dụng của họ nhiều hơn khi chuyển đến Việt Nam so với thời gian ở quê nhà do chi phí sinh hoạt tại đây thấp hơn, thu nhập tăng thêm và doanh nghiệp của họ chi trả một phần chi phí sinh hoạt.
71% chuyên gia nước ngoài cho rằng họ cảm thấy tự tin về nền kinh tế Việt Nam, đồng thời 76% cho rằng cảm thấy yên tâm về tình hình chính trị ổn định.
Các chuyên gia cũng được hưởng các lợi ích vật chất khác khi làm việc tại nước ngoài. 71% chuyên gia nước ngoài làm việc tại Việt Nam cho biết họ có thể đi du lịch nhiều hơn và nhiều người còn có thể học các kỹ năng mới (40%), chẳng hạn một môn ngoại ngữ, kỹ năng lặn biển hay nấu ăn, trong khi một số người (37%) dành thời gian tham gia các hoạt động cộng đồng địa phương nhiều hơn.
Ba lý do hàng đầu tại sao người nước ngoài chuyển đến Việt Nam bao gồm: thăng tiến nghề nghiệp (34%); tìm kiếm thử thách mới (29%), và cải thiện chất lượng cuộc sống (26%).
Với tất cả những nguyện vọng này, 39% chuyên gia nước ngoài đồng ý rằng Việt Nam là điểm đến giúp họ đạt được những tiềm năng của bản thân so với quê nhà. Chỉ số này cao hơn so với mức trung bình toàn cầu là 34%.
Ngoài ra, nhiều người đến Việt Nam có thể học được nhiều kỹ năng mới tại nơi làm việc (59%); được thăng tiến nhanh hơn do chuyển sang nước ngoài làm việc (30%); chuyển sang làm việc ở một lĩnh vực mới (28%) và ngay cả là phát triển kinh doanh mới (26%).
Sau Ấn Độ, Trung Quốc và Indonesia, Việt Nam là địa điểm thứ tư được nhiều chuyên gia nước ngoài dày dặn kinh nghiệm lựa chọn làm nơi sống và làm việc.
Khi mới chuyển đến, 40% chuyên gia nước ngoài tại Việt Nam dự định ở lại dài hơn 5 năm nhưng con số này đã tăng lên 60% sau khi họ cảm nhận được những điều mà cuộc sống tại Việt Nam đem lại.
Ông Phương Tiến Minh – Giám đốc Toàn quốc Khối Ngân hàng Bán lẻ và Quản trị Tài sản của Ngân hàng HSBC Việt Nam cho biết: “Tôi vô cùng tự hào khi Việt Nam là một trong 10 quốc gia hàng đầu được các chuyên gia nước ngoài lựa chọn là điểm đến để tìm kiếm cả cơ hội và thách thức, từ đó thúc đẩy phát triển sự nghiệp, đồng thời tích lũy kinh nghiệm sống và trải nghiệm cho bản thân”.
Nhờ vào một nền văn hóa đầy màu sắc và sự thân thiện của người dân Việt Nam, nơi đây là một lựa chọn tuyệt vời cho các chuyên gia trẻ tuổi và những người đã có kinh nghiệm làm việc từ khắp nơi trên thế giới - những người đang tận hưởng cuộc sống ở đây và nhận được nhiều thành quả xứng đáng.
Ông hy vọng Việt Nam sẽ cải thiện một số lĩnh vực để nâng cao trải nghiệm của người nước ngoài và gia đình họ bằng cách phát triển hơn nữa môi trường, giáo dục và các dịch vụ tài chính.
Hal Varian, chief economist at Google, has a simple way to predict the future. The future is simply what rich people have today. The rich have chauffeurs. In the future, we will have driverless cars that chauffeur us all around. The rich have private bankers. In the future, we will all have robo-bankers.
One thing that we imagine that the rich have today are lives of leisure. So will our future be one in which we too have lives of leisure, and the machines are taking the sweat? We will be able to spend our time on more important things than simply feeding and housing ourselves?
Let’s turn to another chief economist. Andy Haldane is chief economist at the Bank of England. In November 2015, he predicted that 15 million jobs in the UK, roughly half of all jobs, were under threat from automation. You’d hope he knew what he was talking about.
AdvertisementAnd he’s not the only one making dire predictions. Politicians. Bankers. Industrialists. They’re all saying a similar thing.
“We need urgently to face the challenge of automation, robotics that could make so much of contemporary work redundant”, Jeremy Corbyn at the Labour Party Conference in September 2017.
“World Bank data has predicted that the proportion of jobs threatened by automation in India is 69 percent, 77 percent in China and as high as 85 percent in Ethiopia”, according to World Bank president Jim Yong Kim in 2016.
It really does sound like we might be facing the end of work as we know it.
Many of these fears can be traced back to a 2013 study from the University of Oxford. This made a much quoted prediction that 47% of jobs in the US were under threat of automation in the next two decades. Other more recent and detailed studies have made similar dramatic predictions.
Now, there’s a lot to criticize in the Oxford study. From a technical perspective, some of report’s predictions are clearly wrong. The report gives a 94% probability that bicycle repair person will be automated in the next two decades. And, as someone trying to build that future, I can reassure any bicycle repair person that there is zero chance that we will automate even small parts of your job anytime soon. The truth of the matter is no one has any real idea of the number of jobs at risk.
Even if we have as many as 47% of jobs automated, this won’t translate into 47% unemployment. One reason is that we might just work a shorter week. That was the case in the Industrial Revolution. Before the Industrial Revolution, many worked 60 hours per week. After the Industrial Revolution, work reduced to around 40 hours per week. The same could happen with the unfolding AI Revolution.
Another reason that 47% automation won’t translate into 47% unemployment is that all technologies create new jobs as well as destroy them. That’s been the case in the past, and we have no reason to suppose that it won’t be the case in the future. There is, however, no fundamental law of economics that requires the same number of jobs to be created as destroyed. In the past, more jobs were created than destroyed but it doesn’t have to be so in the future.
In the Industrial Revolution, machines took over many of the physical tasks we used to do. But we humans were still left with all the cognitive tasks. This time, as machines start to take on many of the cognitive tasks too, there’s the worrying question: what is left for us humans?
Some of my colleagues suggest there will be plenty of new jobs like robot repair person. I am entirely unconvinced by such claims. The thousands of people who used to paint and weld in most of our car factories got replaced by only a couple of robot repair people.
No, the new jobs will have to be doing jobs where either humans excel or where we choose not to have machines. But here’s the contradiction. In fifty to hundred years time, machines will be super-human. So it’s hard to imagine of any job where humans will remain better than the machines. This means the only jobs left will be those where we prefer humans to do them.
The AI Revolution then will be about rediscovering the things that make us human. Technically, machines will have become amazing artists. They will be able to write music to rival Bach, and paintings to match Picasso. But we’ll still prefer works produced by human artists.
These works will speak to the human experience. We will appreciate a human artist who speaks about love because we have this in common. No machine will truly experience love like we do.
As well as the artistic, there will be a re-appreciation of the artisan. Indeed, we see the beginnings of this already in hipster culture. We will appreciate more and more those things made by the human hand. Mass-produced goods made by machine will become cheap. But items made by hand will be rare and increasingly valuable.
Finally as social animals, we will also increasingly appreciate and value social interactions with other humans. So the most important human traits will be our social and emotional intelligence, as well as our artistic and artisan skills. The irony is that our technological future will not be about technology but all about our humanity.
Toby Walsh is Professor of Artificial Intelligence at the University of New South Wales, in Sydney, Australia. His new book, “Android Dreams: the past, present and future of Artificial Intelligence” was published in the UK by Hurst Publishers in September 2017. It’s available from the Guardian Bookshop. You can read more at his blog, http://thefutureofai.blogspot.com/
Since you’re here…… we have a small favour to ask. More people around the world are reading The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism than ever before. We’ve now been funded by over one million readers. And unlike many news organisations, we have chosen an approach that allows us to keep our journalism open to all. We believe that each one of us deserves access to accurate information with integrity at its heart.
The Guardian is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one edits our editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important as it enables us to give a voice to those less heard, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.
Every contribution we receive from readers like you, big or small, goes directly into funding our journalism. This support enables us to keep working as we do – but we must maintain and build on it for every year to come. Support The Guardian
cậu tham khảo đoạn văn này nha
Since the advent of technology, it has provided us with a more convenient life, but to some extent it has reduced people's ability to reason. Since everyone has depended on them, there will be an inability and sufficient awareness to cope with adverse circumstances. So besides the advantages of technology, we cannot help but mention the limitations of laziness and reliance on human technology.
Chúc cậu học tốt :)))))))))))))))
Tham khảo
Nowaday, the life is modern. Smart phones and computers are very popular and they appear all around us. Using smart phones is a necessary part of many students' life and students should use smartphone in their studying Students can learn in the Internet, search information for their lessons,... Using smart phones can solve many problems quickly and easily. But, there is a problem.Some students mostly use smart phones to relax and spend less time studying. They concentrate on the smart phones instead of keeping their eye on learning.
If students were allowed to use smart phones, learning would be easier . Unless they were banned to use smart phones, they could be focus on learning. Anyway, I think smart phones shouldn't be banned. Although it makes students can't be focus on the lessons, It helps them a lots in relaxing at break time and studying. We've also got some suitable rules such as: not using phones while you are studying, just use them at break time,...
Nowaday, the life is modern. Smart phones and computers are very popular and they appear all around us. Using smart phones is a necessary part of many students' life and students should use smartphone in their studying Students can learn in the Internet, search information for their lessons,... Using smart phones can solve many problems quickly and easily. But, there is a problem.Some students mostly use smart phones to relax and spend less time studying. They concentrate on the smart phones instead of keeping their eye on learning.
If students were allowed to use smart phones, learning would be easier . Unless they were banned to use smart phones, they could be focus on learning. Anyway, I think smart phones shouldn't be banned. Although it makes students can't be focus on the lessons, It helps them a lots in relaxing at break time and studying. We've also got some suitable rules such as: not using phones while you are studying, just use them at break time,...
In modern world, technology has played an active role in people physical lives; on the other hand, it can not touch our spiritual lives while art can. One of several reasons related to this is that art help us express our soul. Actually science is a combinations of tools, methods and machines which solve our physical problems. Meanwhile art such as colorful drawings, paintings, rock songs, romantic movies gives painters, film writers a ability to express their ideas and feelings. That is why art probably touch our soul. Other reason is a benefit of enjoying artworks to who enjoy art. It for instance listening to music and watching movie helps listeners and viewers feel relax after a hard-working day fulled of stress. While, techonology can not cause it can only solve our particular troubles, save time and cost, not a spiritual troubles. In short, both science and art play a significant role in human life, people are not able to live without one of those.
(Tham khảo đi !)
2.In modern world, technology has played an active role in people physical lives; on the other hand, it can not touch our spiritual lives while art can. One of several reasons related to this is that art help us express our soul. Actually science is a combinations of tools, methods and machines which solve our physical problems. Meanwhile art such as colorful drawings, paintings, rock songs, romantic movies gives painters, film writers a ability to express their ideas and feelings. That is why art probably touch our soul. Other reason is a benefit of enjoying artworks to who enjoy art. It for instance listening to music and watching movie helps listeners and viewers feel relax after a hard-working day fulled of stress. While, techonology can not cause it can only solve our particular troubles, save time and cost, not a spiritual troubles. In short, both science and art play a significant role in human life, people are not able to live without one of those.
I love to imagine.It is quite fun.I don't really like the way my school is now,so I have an idea about my dream school.My dream school will be pretty llarge.It will be just like a town.Here,students will be like sisters or brothers.They will share and help each other.My dream school will also have teachers,but they won't teach us difficult things much.Instead,they will do exercises,have fun with students.My dream school won't use notebooks or books,because ipads and computers will be used much.We can learn more and play in freetime.The playground will have:slides,swings,...like other regular schools.Just a bit odd by having dancing floor,karaoke rooms,...It sound fun,isn't it.I like my dream school,alot.
TK :
Hello. Today, I will talk about my dream school. When my child was in elementary school I always wanted to go to a modern school. I watch movies and I see a lot of modern and convenient schools. The school has many classes. Specialized subjects will have their own rooms. The school will have vending machines. My school will have a gym room. We will have healthy sports such as basketball, badminton, … the campus will be planted with flowers and trees. What is your dream school? Please share to let me know!