Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Decision making is a very difficult task for me, whether it is in my personal or professional life. Some people take their decisions by taking their own time, while others take immediately. I believe that, most of the time, decisions made in hurry are poor decisions. There is a chance of mistakes and it could also create problems, and therefore, I think people should take their decisions after careful thought.
To begin with my first reason for this opinion is decisions made in hurry increases our chances of making mistakes and creates problems. From my own experience, if I have to cook something in hurry, then I always forget to add something in my recipe and that make my recipe taste less. Second, while working out, if I try to exercise in hurry, then I might have to face some physical injury or pain. So, I believe that, everyone should take their decisions by thinking and taking some time, which can save them from problems.
Second, most of the time, decisions made in hurry consider as poor decisions. Many times people could not make right decision in hurry. For example, while playing, if players know that opposite team is doing good, and with this pressure player takes poor decision and loose the match. Second example, while working in office with pressure and time limitations, employees take wrong decisions in hurry, this can have bad effect on their overall performance. So, at such situations, we should be quick, but not in hurry, that helps us to take good decision. Hence, thinking before taking any decisions allow us to take wise decision.
Finally, many times we have to take decisions on the spot. In such situations, we should be sharp, and quick in our thoughts, but not in hurry. Because, decisions made in hurry could be poor; could make mistakes, and create problems. So, it is always better to give a thought before taking any decisions.
Industries and businesses are the most concern in many cities as they make the city more congested and pollute the environment in one hand, while creating job opportunities and contribute to the development of the city on the other hand. Many of the enterprises are operated and promoted in bigger cities only. Encouraging them to move to regional areas is a good idea. I have more benefits than drawbacks.
There are several advantages to the industry and should take initiatives to so. The most important aspect is the development of the regional areas. Setting up of enterprises in rural areas will help to develop basic infrastructures transportation, electricity and road in rural areas. In addition, the people of this area will have the golden opportunity of employment and that would enhance the living standard as well. Moreover, the economic activity of the area will increase and that will let the government take further initiatives in order to develop this urban area. The different types of small businesses and industries hotel, lodge, suppliers will emerge and that will support other businesses and add value to the economy of these areas.
Regional offices are often helpful to expand businesses and to reduce the manufacturing and operating costs. Có nhiều công nghiệp lớn nhất sẽ được thực hiện từ này. Again the pressure on the big cities would reduce and that would lessen many serious issues pollutions, traffic jam and waste management.
Despite this, there are several disadvantages of moving businesses and industries to regional areas. One of the most prominent drawbacks is the exploitation of natural resources. The industry will use forest resources, which will cause environmental degradation pollution, climate change and much more. The gradual increase in the population size in such urban areas will increase the crime rate. Finally relocating an industry to a different place involves a great amount of costs and the industry would not want to spend this amount naturally.
All in all, comparing the good look and the bad, I think that the government must encourage the industries and businesses to move to the regional areas where they would operate in better fashion for the overall betterment of economy and environment and population.
Sample Answer 1:
Some environmental problems are regional like cyclones and some others are global - greenhouse effects for instance. With the span of time, most of the environmental problems are becoming global issues and I believe that global initiatives should be taken for the best result and to make the world a better place to live in.
To begin with, environmental problems are generally caused by humans and while some of them are national in nature, most of them are global issues. Noise or water pollution at a time remain national problems but after a certain period, it would turn into a problem for the whole world. Thus if some environmental problems are left unaddressed due to its span in a country, it would soon become the problem for all nations.
Moreover, not all nations are equally qualified to address issues of such magnitude, due to their economic and political aspects, and this is why other affluent nations should extend their helping hands to solve such problems. Rich nations contribute more to the global warming and this is why they need to build a common platform to bring all nations together to fight the environmental problems. For a poor country, it is quite tough to allocate budget for saving the greenery while millions of its population are suffering from hunger and natural disaster. This is why other rich nations have natural obligations to help those poor or developing nations.
To draw the conclusion, global environmental problems like greenhouse effects, global warming etc. have already become the concern for every nation. A collaborative effort to address these problems would be a better strategy while each nation is not equally adept to solve the global problems.
Model Answer 2:
Environmental problems greatly vary in terms of their magnitudes and some of these are local, while others are definitely global in nature - the greenhouse effect or global warming for example. For the best result, these short of problems should be addressed at the most appropriate levels, sometimes even at multiple levels.
To begin with, some environmental problems are generally caused by a group of people in a particular region and these issues get accelerated by the rapid expansion of industrialisation in this region. These sorts of problems often include noise pollution, air pollution, deforestation, intoxicating waste disposal etc. and these are generally national in nature. It is better to address these types of environmental problems at the national level and educating people is a viable solution in this scenario. International aid sometimes can help a poor or developing country to address environmental problems but the government of the country should take initiatives to solve such national problems.
Having said that, some environmental problems, for instance, common river, coastline or sea pollution concerns more than one countries and those sorts of problems should be addressed at a bilateral level. Similarly, if an environmental problem concerns a large region, for instance, a continent, that should be discussed and fought by the countries that are located on this continent. Some common examples of this type of environmental problems are desertification, soil erosion, aridness and floods.
Finally, some environmental problems pervade across national boundaries and calls for multinational or global collaboration. For example, radioactive industrial wastages in oceans, ozone layer degradation, global warming are global issues and these types of problems should be addressed by every single nation in the world. For greater success and effectiveness, I believe that the commitment of countries, especially rich nations, is quite important.
To conclude, environmental problems should be viewed as a common problem for the mankind and those global problems should be endorsed and shared globally by all nations. Similarly, rich nationals should help the developing nations to fight their regional and national environmental problems for the best result.
Along with the development of the society, there are an increasing number of issues brought to consideration, one of which is how to approach environmental problems that are threats to people’s quality of life in the modern era. There emerging a standpoint stating the issue should be better addressed on global scale, while others believe it is individual countries’ responsibility. This essay’s aim is providing personal position favoring both viewpoints and appropriate reasons.
On the one hand, solving environmental problems should be first each country’s mission. As each individual country cover a particular part of global natural environment, it is responsible for preserving that part. Suppose citizens on the globe all excellently accomplish their obligation of dealing with environmental problems in the frame of their country, consequently, the issue could be remedied on global scale. Besides, a country itself is believed to best understand its environmental problems. Therefore, it can create appropriate solutions fitting its resources and financial conditions.
On the other hand, good results are also generated when the issue is considered a global duty. International organizations, world forums and pacts provide an ideal circumstance for countries’ leaders to discuss environmental problems. As a proverb goes “Two heads are better than one”, a number of brilliant world leaders may come up with creative remedies for a particularly difficult-to-solve environmental issue of a country. Moreover, in such conferences, wealthier countries have opportunities to provide help for poorer nations that possess little resources to handle their own environmental problems. By mutual assistance among countries, global environmental issues may be handled well.
Briefly, I strongly believe the best result will be produced when environmental problems are addressed both on global scale and by each country. It is both individual and the world’s responsibility to preserve the environment for the next generation.
Ngày nay, nhiều người kết hôn với một người khác văn hoá hơn bao giờ hết. Tại sao chuyện này đang xảy ra? Thảo luận cả lợi ích lẫn xu hướng của xu hướng này. Cho biết lý do cho câu trả lời của bạn và bao gồm bất kỳ ví dụ nào có liên quan từ kiến thức hoặc kinh nghiệm của chính bạn.
Tourism is a unique human activity, experienced by millions of people worldwide every year. As people differ in their attitude towards almost everything in life, the same applies also to tourism; where some treat tourism globally as the focus of their act without scrutinising the other related activities pertaining to it. Hence, the term 'responsible tourism" emerged; in order to pay a sufficient attention of the tourist to the local cultural values of the destination country, and – more globally – to the environment. From my point of view, tourism must be labelled as a "responsible activity"; even if it is mandatory to issue as many local and international legislations to make it so.
While making tourism, should the tourist carry his culture with him to the foreign country? Obviously, the answer is "No". If the tourist insists on doing this, he will sure subject himself to great dangers especially in communities with intolerant local citizens. One of the best examples of this is the "Thump Up" sign which is greatly practised in many countries; where this sign is USA means "OK or very good"; while it is considered as very crude and impolite in Greece (which is a famous touristic destination). Thus, it is crucial to teach the tourists a list of common practices that they must refrain from doing, explaining the reasons behind this.
When it comes to the environment, it is indeed very unfortunate to find that the touristic areas are those with the greatest pollution and litter output! A few years ago, it was really surprising that an international campaign of volunteers aimed to clean the Himalayas from the trash left by the climbers.
In conclusion, tourism should be dealt with in the same way as freedom; that it must be "responsible", respecting both the local cultural and environmental values of each society.
Bạn có thể tham khảo bài này ở trang IELTS Mentor nha!
* taht -> that
I am disagree with that. I think , in this modern world , it is very important that many children should go to school but they can also spend time on the Internet. It is not waste. Morever, it is better. As you know, going to school can help us get much knowledge and many information. When we go home , we have to do our homework. We can discover many things we like in the Internet such as : English , music, Math , .... ect . The internet is also important. We can learn in the Internet. But don't use it to play games too much , it harms your eyes. Ok ?
Chúc bạn học tốt !
Tham khảo:
Without water no living thing on the earth could survive. We need water To quench our thirst. water our lands to grow crops or to keep the animals and fowls in our homes alive. Even the plants and insects in all parts in the world need water to live.
We also need water to produce electricity and to carry our goods or trade. Electricity is very important for our comforts today. Almost everything that we use in our homes today depends on the use of electricity. In the same way, water also helps to transport many or the goods that we need for our homes. Ships, rafts and boats carry many things from distant lands and help to exchange goods between one country and another. Transport by water is easier and cheaper than by air or land.
But water has also caused much sorrow and hardship in all parts of the world floods and heavy rains have destroyed crops, lives and property through the centuries and caused much sorrow everywhere.
Yet, water is so important that all living things, including the tiniest of creatures, will continue to struggle to get it whenever or wherever they can.
Writing
She..has donated...blood twenty times so far
Volunteers can do general.activities...such as clean-up projects or home repair
We came to the remote village and.cook ...meals for homeless children
He..has given..lectures to foreign tourists about traditional food and games recently
You should think of..taking part in..the volunteers activities in your community
Traditional volunteers activities include.raising...money for people in need cooking and giving food
How many novels...did..Charles Dickens..write.?
You can help young children by...helping..them to do homework before or after school
Television has many useful and educational programs that can help children learn useful things, some knowledge about nature from the programs on television. However, watching TV regularly is not necessarily good for children. So I disagree about letting children watch TV regularly at school and at home.
Watching television regularly will make children have eye problems, addiction to television and will have health consequences such as obesity and asthma. Not only does TV not only have educational programs but it also has many programs that teach children about bad habits, causing many children to engage in aggressive, violent or irritable behaviors. In addition, it can also reduce creativity and imagination, become ineffective at work, and watch a lot of TV will decrease academic performance. Affects perception of the world around them. Lack of social language skills, limited interaction with others and other essential social skills.
So avoid letting children watch TV a lot, as it can greatly affect future generations . We need to encourage children to participate in outdoor activities to exercise their health.